Hijacking and Search Parameter Injection: A technical and practical analysis

Posted by

  


In today's cybersecurity and web optimization landscape, new manipulation techniques are constantly emerging, many of which can compromise the integrity of websites or manipulate search engine results. 

Two of these techniques are hijacking (in various forms, such as “SEO hijacking” or “session hijacking”) and search parameter injection. This article aims to provide a detailed overview of both, accompanied by technical examples, practical implications and effective countermeasures.

🔗 Do you like Techelopment? Check out the site for all the details!

1. Hijacking: Definition and Types

1.1 Definition

The term hijacking, literally “diverting,” in the computer field refers to the act of taking control of a digital resource (such as a user session, a web page, or a traffic flow) without authorization. In SEO contexts, the term takes on more specific connotations related to the manipulation of indexing in search engines.

1.2 Main types

a. Session Hijacking

Session hijacking consists in stealing or manipulating the session identifier (session ID) of a user to obtain unauthorized access. It is often done through HTTP traffic interception, cross-site scripting (XSS), or man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Example:

A user accesses a web application over unencrypted HTTP. An attacker intercepts traffic with Wireshark and obtains a session cookie:

GET /dashboard HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Cookie: sessionid=abc123xyz

The attacker uses this cookie to log in to the user's account.

b. SEO Hijacking

SEO hijacking is a technique used to hijack a site's ranking in Google search results. It can be done in several ways:

  • Unauthorized 301/302 redirects

  • Copying content (scraping) with manipulated links

  • Cloaking, or presenting different content to Google and users

  • Using search parameter injection (see next section)

Example: A malicious site creates a copy of a legitimate page, but adds links to its own domain, trying to steal traffic or reputation. 

Let's see in more detail how it happens:

b1. Identifying the legitimate site

  • The attacker chooses an authoritative site, such as a blog or e-commerce with good positioning on Google (e.g. https://www.example-legittimo.com/articolo-importante).

b2. Content Scraping

  • Using a scraper (for example a Python script with BeautifulSoup or a tool like HTTrack) copies the entire HTML code:

<!-- Original on www.example-legitimo.com -->
<article> 
<h1>The 10 best running shoes</h1> 
<p>...</p> 
<ul> 
<li><a href="/products/nike-pegasus">Nike Pegasus</a></li> 
<li><a href="/products/adidas-ultra">Adidas Ultra</a></li> 
</ul>
</article>

b3. Internal link modification

  • In the cloned HTML, replaces all links pointing to the legitimate domain with links to its own malicious domain:

<!-- Malicious version on www.attacker-ecom.com -->
<article>
<h1>Top 10 Running Shoes</h1>
<p>...</p>
<ul>
<!-- Before: /prodotti/nike-pegasus -->
<!-- After: link to their affiliate or spam page -->
<li><a href="https://www.attacco-ecom.com/nike-pegasus-scontate">Nike Pegasus</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.attacco-ecom.com/adidas-ultra-offerta">Adidas Ultra</a></li>
</ul>
</article>

  • Add, if desired, new promotional paragraphs or banners.

b4. Publication on the malicious domain

  • The “spoofed” content is uploaded to a public server (e.g. www.attacker-ecom.com/10-running-shoes.html).

b5. Indexing by search engines

  • Since the URL is different, Google considers the new page to be new content. In the ranking, thanks to the original quality of the text, it could be positioned near or above the original.

  • All the “modified” links will flow traffic (and some SEO “link juice”) to the malicious site.

b6. Practical Effects

  1. Traffic Diversion
    Users searching for “Top 10 Running Shoes” land on the attacker’s site instead of the legitimate one.

  2. Loss of Trust
    If links lead to fake offers or malware, the user perceives a negative experience and blames the “genuine” domain.

  3. SEO poisoning
    The legitimate domain can suffer penalties due to duplicate content or spam reports.

How to recognize it

  • Check Google Search Console: Look for suspicious URLs with titles or snippets that are identical to yours.

  • Search “site:” + exact title

    site:attacco-ecom.com "Top 10 Running Shoes"

    If your headline comes up, that's a good indicator.

  • Monitoring tools: Services like Copyscape or Siteliner report clone pages.

Countermeasures

  1. Canonical tag
    In the <head> of your article:

    <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example-legitimo.com/article-important"/>

  2. Robots.txt
    Lock directories suspicious or parameters if you have an internal search engine.

  3. Text watermark
    Insert unique phrases (“continuously updated from 2025”) that, if duplicated, let you immediately identify the scraper.

  4. DMCA / webmaster reports
    Submit a copyright infringement to Google to remove the clone.

In summary, SEO hijacking via content scraping and link injection exploits the reputation of a trusted site to funnel traffic and authority to a malicious domain, but can be countered with canonicalization, constant monitoring, and anti-scraping policies.


2. Search Parameter Injection

2.1 What is Search Parameter Injection

search parameter injection is a technique by which an attacker manipulates URL search parameters to:

  • Trick search engines into indexing unwanted content

  • Generating dynamic pages containing spam, malicious content or affiliate advertising

  • Manipulating the behavior of internal searches of a site

This technique is often used to do “parasite SEO”, that is, inserting fake or uncontrolled pages inside a legitimate domain to gain advantage of it.

2.2 Technical Mechanism

Many websites use query strings to handle internal search, for example:

https://example.com/search?q=running+shoes

If the site does not properly validate the q parameter, the attacker can manipulate it:

https://example.com/search?q=<script>document.location='http://evil.com'</script>

Or, more commonly, they can inject text content or spam:

https://example.com/search?q=viagra+gratis+spedizione

Google, in an attempt to crawl and index every unique URL, may accidentally index such pages, creating “backdoors” into the site for spam content.

2.3 Practical Example of Search Parameter Injection

Step-by-step

  1. An attacker discovers that an e-commerce site has an internal search engine accessible via URL:
    https://shoponline.com/search?query=

  2. Attempts to send a manipulated string:
    https://shoponline.com/search?query=buy+cheap+cialis+online

  3. If the search page generates a response like:
    "Results for buy cheap cialis online"
    without any validation, Google can index it.

  4. Result: The page appears in Google results with spam snippets, using the credibility of the legitimate domain.


3. ​​Security and SEO Implications

3.1 Risks

  • SEO poisoning: the site appears in Google results with malicious or misleading content.

  • Loss of reputation: Users see spam results with the domain name.

  • Blacklist: Google can penalize the site or exclude it from indexes.

  • Data leakage: In the case of hijacking sessions or queries containing data personal.

3.2 Common vectors

  • Lack of parameter sanitization

  • Internal search implemented server-side without filters

  • Absence of robots.txt that blocks indexing of URLs with queries

  • XSS or open redirect vulnerability


4. Mitigation Strategies

4.1 Validation and Sanitization

Every URL parameter must be validated. Example in PHP:

$q = htmlspecialchars($_GET['q'], ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');

Or in a framework like Laravel:

$request->validate([
'q' => 'string|max:100'
]);

4.2 Prevent Indexing

Block indexing of search parameters with robots.txt:

User-agent: *
Disallow: /search

Or use HTML tags:

<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow">

4.3 Monitoring and Auditing

  • Use Google Search Console to detect suspicious URLs

  • Monitor server logs for anomalous queries

  • Implement rate limiting to prevent abuse

4.4 Session Protection

  • Use HTTPS Everywhere

  • Regenerate session ID after login

  • Set HttpOnly and Secure attributes in cookies

  • Implement session time-out and IP/user-agent validation


Conclusion

The phenomenon of hijacking and search parameter injection represents an insidious threat that involves aspects of both cybersecurity and search engine optimization. Ignoring or underestimating these techniques exposes websites to significant risks, from loss of organic traffic to undermining user trust. Through proper input validation, careful crawler configuration, and proactive monitoring, you can effectively mitigate these attacks and preserve the integrity of your digital ecosystem.


Bibliography and useful resources



Follow me #techelopment

Official site: www.techelopment.it
facebook: Techelopment
instagram: @techelopment
X: techelopment
Bluesky: @techelopment
telegram: @techelopment_channel
whatsapp: Techelopment
youtube: @techelopment