🤖 Context Degradation in AI: when AI "forgets" or "flattens"

  

Artificial Intelligence, especially the one based on Large Language Models (LLM) like ChatGPT or Gemini, has become a powerful tool. However, with prolonged use and the expansion of its capabilities, a critical problem emerges: context degradation.

This phenomenon manifests itself in two distinct but equally worrying ways:

  1. loss of concentration in long conversations (context degradation)
  2. general impoverishment of model knowledge over time (model collapse)

🔗 Do you like Techelopment? Take a look at the website for all the details!

1. The Memory Limit: Fixed-Length Context Degradation

The first type of degradation occurs during real-time use of an LLM and ties directly into the concept of a context window.

What is the Context Window?

Think of the context window as an LLM's working memory: it's the maximum number of tokens (words, punctuation, or parts thereof) that the model can process in a single request to formulate a response.

  • The Attention Mechanism: LLMs use the Attention mechanism (Attention) to weight the importance of various tokens within the window. The computational complexity of this mechanism, however, increases quadratically (O(n2)) with the length of the sequence (n). As the conversation grows longer, the computational load increases and, paradoxically, the difficulty for the model to focus on the most relevant information.
  • Loss of Consistency: When a conversation exceeds the size of the context window, older information is truncated or "forgotten." This causes the model to miss key details, generate less coherent responses, or repeat itself, a limitation known as "Long-Chat Degradation."
  • The Half-Context "Blind Spot": Recent research, such as the Needle in a Haystack test, has revealed that LLMs tend to process information located at the beginning or end of the context window better, struggling to retrieve data located in the middle.

📌 How to Tell When You're Halfway Through the Context Window

There's no standard visual "counter" built into chat interfaces that tells you exactly "you're at token X of Y," but there are practical methods to estimate where you are in relation to the context window and mitigate the problem.

The way to tell if you're Halfway (or beyond) relies on three key steps: knowing the model limit, estimating your conversation, and monitoring for signs of degradation.

1. Knowing the Limit of Your LLM (Token Measure)

The first step is to find out the maximum context window size of the model you are using.

  • Identify the Limit: Each model (e.g., GPT-4, Claude 3, Llama 3) has a maximum token limit (e.g., 8k, 32k, 128k, 200k). Look for the specific limit for the version you are using.
  • Tokens vs. Words: AI models don't count words, but tokens. A token is a smaller unit of text that can be a whole word, part of a word, or a punctuation mark.

A common rule of thumb is that 1 token equals, on average, about 4 characters in English, or 1.5 words in Italian (the ratio may vary slightly depending on the language and the model's tokenizer).

Example: If your model has a limit of 32,000 tokens, the middle of the context window (the point of potential "central blindness") is at 16,000 tokens, which roughly equates to about 10,000–11,000 words of text.

2. Estimating the Length of Your Conversation

The context window includes all the text of the session: 1. Your messages (input). 2. The model's responses (output). 3. System instructions (hidden).

  • Use a Token Counter: Many LLM providers offer online "tokenizer" tools or APIs that allow you to paste the text of your conversation to get an exact token count.
  • The Relevance Factor: You should measure not only the length, but also the position of critical information. Remember the discovery of the needle in a haystack: AI struggles to retrieve key information that's in the middle of a long sequence of text. If your crucial information has been delivered halfway through the session and you're moving on with a lot of irrelevant text, you're in a high-risk zone for degradation.

3. Monitor Signs of Degradation

The most practical way to determine when you've passed halfway through the context window—or that the AI ​​is no longer using key information—is to observe changes in the LLM's behavior.

Sign of Degradation What It Means What to Do
Loss of Coherence The AI ​​generates responses that ignore facts or details mentioned at the beginning of the conversation. Rephrase the your request specifying that the AI ​​needs to retrieve a specific detail ("Remembering what we said in point 3...")
Repetitions The AI ​​starts reusing the same sentences, boilerplate, or repeating your input. You're near the window limit; the AI ​​is struggling to generate new, original text.
Hallucinations Starts making up facts or "remembering" things that were never said. The AI ​​is disoriented and can't find coherent information. It's time to start a new chat session.
Generic Responses Replies become vague, superficial, or don't address your request in detail. The pressure of long context has reduced its ability to think deeply.

✅ The Best Strategy (Context Engineering)

Don't rely on overall length alone. The most effective strategy for managing the context window is called Context Engineering:

  • Active Summarization: When you feel the conversation is getting too long, ask the AI ​​to summarize the key points of the conversation so far. Then, you can use that summary (which is much shorter) as a prompt for the new request.
  • RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) Method: For complex and lengthy tasks, keep critical information (e.g., documents, rules) outside the chat and recall it only when necessary.

In summary, while there's no traffic light to warn you, by monitoring the model's estimated tokens and performance signals, you can actively manage the conversation to prevent degradation.


2. Knowledge Erosion: Model Collapse

The second and more insidious type of degradation occurs not in the use, but in the training of LLMs and represents a long-term risk to the entire AI ecosystem. This phenomenon is called Model Collapse.

The AI-Generated Data Problem (AIGC)

Historically, LLMs have been trained on massive datasets of human-generated content (HGC) on the web. Today, with the proliferation of AI, much of the new content on the internet is AI-Generated Content (AIGC).

  • The Vicious Circle: When a new generation of AIGC is trained on a dataset that includes a significant amount of output produced by previous AIGCs, a vicious circle is created. The model begins to learn from its own "creations" rather than from the richness and variety of the original human data.
  • The Photocopy Effect: Researchers liken this process to repeatedly copying a photocopy. Each copy adds some "noise" or inaccuracy. In the context of AI, this noise consists of errors, stereotypes, or inaccuracies present in the AIGC. With each generation of retraining, the quality and diversity of the model's output declines.
  • Result: Flattening and Hallucinations: Model collapse leads to a flattening of responses, which become more general, less accurate, and, over time, completely nonsensical or filled with hallucinations (false information presented as fact). The model loses its ability to generalize, and its "view" of the world narrows.

💡 Strategies to Mitigate Degradation

The AI ​​community is actively working to address these issues:

  1. Prioritize Human Data: The most important prevention of model collapse is giving greater weight to the original human-generated data in the training dataset.
  2. Context Management Techniques: For length-related degradation, techniques such as:
    • Periodic Summarization: Automatically summarize older parts of a conversation to keep key points within the current window. context.
    • Prompt Engineering: Structure the prompt to place the most critical information at the beginning or end of the window.
  3. Advanced Model Architectures: Develop new architectures that manage attention more efficiently.entity or that extend the context window without exploding computational costs (e.g., RoPE, AliBi).

Addressing context degradation is essential to ensure that AI remains a useful and reliable tool in the long run, and does not simply reproduce a distorted version of itself.



Follow me #techelopment

Official site: www.techelopment.it
facebook: Techelopment
instagram: @techelopment
X: techelopment
Bluesky: @techelopment
telegram: @techelopment_channel
whatsapp: Techelopment
youtube: @techelopment