 |
Starting a career in software development is an exciting, but sometimes overwhelming, journey. To build a solid, lasting foundation, it's not enough to write code that works: you need to develop robust scientific thinking. Here are five essential pillars for every junior developer.
1. Basics are Not Optional: Learn the Theory Before Practice
Many juniors, eager to see immediate results, dive straight into the framework or the latest language. This approach is unsustainable in the long run. High-level software development is based on universal concepts.
- Data Structures and Algorithms: Before writing a line of code, you need to understand how data is managed in memory (Arrays, Lists, Hashmaps, Trees, etc.). This allows you to choose the right tool for the job, which is crucial for efficiency.
- Algorithmic Complexity – O(n): Learn asymptotic notation (Big O Notation). Understanding whether your algorithm is O(1), O(log n), O(n), or O(n2) is the difference between a fast application and one that collapses under load. This is not an academic exercise, but a practical requirement for writing scalable code.
2. Master the Art of Clean Code: Learn Best Practices
Code is read more often than it is written. Learning best practices isn't just a matter of aesthetics, but of maintainability and collaboration.
- S.O.L.I.D. Principles: These five principles are the backbone of quality object-oriented programming (OOP).
- Naming: Give variables, functions, and classes meaningful names. A function should do exactly what its name suggests.
- Avoid "Magic Numbers": Don't insert hard-coded numeric values directly into your code. Define constants with meaningful names.
- Refer to Additional Resources: Explore and embrace other fundamentals such as abstraction and encapsulation. To delve deeper into these and other crucial concepts, we recommend referring to the article: Best Practices Development.
3. Understand "Vibe Coding" (and Its Limitations)
"Vibe coding" is a relatively new phenomenon, closely tied to the effectiveness of AI-powered code completion tools (such as GitHub Copilot or similar models). This term describes the practice of writing code based on intuition, vaguely remembered syntax, or, more often, immediate and complete suggestions provided by artificial intelligence, without a full understanding of the underlying logic or API.
"Vibe coding" (writing code based on intuition or immediate suggestions from an AI) is a growing phenomenon. Its use must bebe measured.
- Pros: It can speed up repetitive tasks or help you get oriented in a new language (great for prototyping).
- Cons: It's not how you build the foundation of a project. If you don't understand the solution provided, you'll never be able to debug the problems that will inevitably arise.
🟢 When Vibe Coding Can Be Useful
When used with caution, vibe coding can offer advantages, especially for more experienced developers or at specific stages of the project:
Speed of Prototyping: It's excellent for quickly creating boilerplates (repetitive, boilerplate code) or implementing simple features in the prototyping phase, allowing you to immediately see how the product will look.
Syntactic Support: It can help those learning a new language overcome the initial block, suggesting the correct syntax for basic methods or structures.
Repetitive Tasks: To write loops, getter/setter methods, or small utility functions, it can act as a turbo, reducing the need for typing.
🔴 The Critical Risks of Vibe Coding
For the junior developer, relying on vibe coding is a trap that compromises learning and the quality of work:
Fragility and Impossible Debugging: If you copy and paste a block of code generated Without understanding the inner workings of AI, you won't have the mental tools to debug when the code fails. A problem in production requires you to be able to analyze the logic, not just the syntax.
Silent Technical Debt: AI doesn't know the specific context of your project, your naming conventions (point 2), or your scalability needs. "Vibe" code may be functional but inefficient or poorly structured, introducing technical debt that the team will have to pay for later.
Lack of Engineering Thinking: A developer's true value isn't typing fast, but problem solving. Relying on immediate suggestions bypasses the process of analyzing complexity and evaluating different algorithmic solutions. You're not building skills, you're just assembling components.
In short: vibe coding is a technique to be used to increase productivity on code that you already fully understand, but it should never be the way you approach the implementation of complex logic or the architectural foundation of a new project. Understanding must always precede speed.
4. 🧠NAIF (No AI First) Approach: Don't Skip Skill Building
Relying on AI right away is an approach that actively sabotages your growth as a developer because it eliminates the discovery process.
The Traditional Path: Growth Through Effort
Most professional developers have built their careers and their deep understanding of code by following a specific path:
Active Search (Information and Data): The problem presents itself, and you must search for the solution. This means sifting through documentation, blog posts, forums (like Stack Overflow), and other people's code.
Sharpen Your Wits: As you research, you're forced to filter, assess the reliability of sources, and analyze different implementations. This sharpens your insight and critical thinking.
The Work of the Brain (Synapses): Once the information is gathered, the real work of an engineer begins: activating the synapses to integrate that data and find the best suited solution for your specific context.
Discovery and Deep Insights: It is in this process of "hands-on" that discoveries occur. As you struggle to find a solution, you delve into concepts you had previously ignored, discover why one algorithm is slower than another, and your knowledge becomes consolidated.
The "AI First" Approach: The Recipe for Incompetence
When you ask AI to solve the problem, you skip everythingthe fundamental steps described above.
- The Destructive Copy & Paste: The model provides you with a ready-made (often correct) solution that you are led to copy and paste. At that moment, you are a copy/paste operator, not a software engineer.
- Lack of Understanding (and Debugging): Having not participated in the discovery process, you may not fully understand the nuances of the solution. What happens when the provided solution fails or introduces a bug? You lack the background knowledge needed to debug or adapt it.
- The Destructive Equation:
No Information + No Data + No Synapses = No Discovery = Knowledge Stall
5. 🛠️ AI to Improve, Not to Solve
Once the NAIF concept is established, AI becomes a powerful ally. Don't use it to overcome the initial hurdle, but to refine your work.
Trust AI only after you have mastered the problem and implemented your solution.
Intelligent Uses of AI:
- Refactoring: Ask AI to suggest ways to improve the readability of your code.
- Optimization: Consider whether it can suggest a more efficient implementation from an O(n) complexity perspective.
- Test Generation: Get help writing unit tests for code you've already completed.
AI is an accelerator, but it can't replace
the theoretical foundation and problem-solving process
that define a true software engineer.
Start off right: learn to solve before delegating.
Follow me #techelopment
Official site: www.techelopment.it
facebook: Techelopment
instagram: @techelopment
X: techelopment
Bluesky: @techelopment
telegram: @techelopment_channel
whatsapp: Techelopment
youtube: @techelopment
